|
An
Overview: There is Nothing Post About Current Traumatic
Stresses
By Darling
Graciela Villena-Mata, Ph.D.

Does the blind man own his escort? No, neither do
we the story;
rather it is the story that owns us and directs us.
Chinua Achebe, Anthills of the Savannah (1987)
For many people, trauma is still part of their lives.
It is their main story; their ‘guiding light’.
It is not part of their past or history. It is. Rather,
it is their lead story which for many, govern their
perceptions of their world and of themselves within
that world. From those that follow lives of domestic
violence to those who are ‘recipients’
of hate crimes to those who are triggered by “isms”
in their midst, they find themselves reacting and
creating skills to help keep themselves safe and to
create “islands” of trust where they can
exhale; albeit partially for some.
The increase of fear, the triggers or reminders in
the news and increase tension between communities
serve to create similar coping skills and reactions
that one would see in people experiencing post-traumatic
stress. Although the symptoms and responses are similar
to those experiencing ptsd, the intervention and approaches
to addressing concurrent stresses may be different.
Considerations such as a person’s group history,
degree and intensity of the triggers and current traumas,
where s/he is on the polyculturation spectrum, the
type of “safety” islands created; level
of support from her/his group(s); grief and identity
formation are but some of the elements to assess.
When dealing with groups, an understanding of history,
social justice perceptions of that group vis-à-vis
the dominant group/society, and the current attitudes
of that group both by that group and by others will
help to tailor clinical and educational approaches
in assisting them with their current traumatic issues.
In addition to clinical interventions and treatment,
educational and narrative psychological approaches
have assisted individuals and groups in “re-storying”
their lives. For group-oriented individuals and their
groups, the use of narrative psychology is a natural
extension of their worldview. For individual-oriented
individuals and their groups, the narrative provides
an avenue for them to explore what they have and what
they need to develop in order to create a bridge to
a safer land of living.
Storytelling methods and techniques used by indigenous
nations such as the Aborigines, the Maoris, and First
Nations, which have been ‘westernized’
by Epston and White and others into Narrative psychology
have made the indigenous approaches accessible to
many as intervention and treatment methods and approaches.
For current traumas, it becomes essential for the
person to re-author their worldview. The use of language,
its positioning, metaphors, externalization of issues
away from the human being, and creating bridges of
usable current dynamics while empowering the client
to seek and create additional tools – are some
of the aspects found in narrative psychology.
In addition to the psychological components of trauma,
as providers it is important to understand the physiological.
While we are well aware of the “fight and flight”
responses activated by the sympathetic nervous system
of the autonomic system, there are other physiological
areas that we would do well to consider with whatever
training we provide; namely transgenerational transmissions
and the concept of “freeze”. Understanding
the physiological transmissions passed from one generation
to another (see research by Danieli and Yehuda) can
help one to understand the hairline trigger reaction
to trauma for some individuals and a dull reaction
for others. Studies on transgenerational themes (versus
intergenerational themes) by clinicians and researchers,
such as Anne Schuztenberg and Maurice Apprey have
helped many recipients of trauma cut the unconscious
and sometimes physiological ties transmitted from
their ancestors.
Peter Levine’s work on “freeze”
and the need for humans to learn to ‘defreeze’
have assisted many in letting go of being in a life-threatening
stance in their lives. The physiological ramifications
of “f,f,f” or “fight, flight, and
freeze” needs to be addressed and turned off
when there is clearly no life threatening situation
in the individual’s lives. Getting that person
to ‘stand down’ from red alert to green
alert becomes then a whole person affair. Getting
that extra energy created by the immune system to
dissipate as well as to tell the sympathetic nervous
system to switch over to the parasympathetic becomes
essential if restoration and healing are to occur.
Work by Peter Levine, John Upledger, and others who
addressed the dissipation of those energies created
by the immune system, have proven to be beneficial
for those individuals with traumatic stories.
But what if there is merit to having the “fff”
on? It then becomes when to turn it on fully and when
to turn it down. When to hit that ‘dimming’
switch becomes part of the intervention approach.
Having it turned on fully, as we now know, not only
stresses the person on the psychological level but
also stresses that person’s health. Yet turning
it off completely is foolhardy for individuals and
groups still subjected to present-day “isms”
and possible traumatic results.
Increase discussion of evidence can be found in today’s
journals, talk shows, newspapers and internet sites
that stress is becoming one of the major factors for
autoimmune illnesses, increase conflicts, sleep disorders,
and even the selection of what we eat.
This article started off with a quote from Chinua
Achebe saying that the story owns us. Yes, but only
if we see ourselves as the actors in our lives and
not the writers. The moment we can truly experience
the power of being the autobiographer of our stories,
then the road to a new land of story can be created,
using what we have and accessing what we need. Understanding
how traumas induced by groups and societies can affect
the whole human being helps us to better provide training
to those who give direct services.
Traumatic stresses have many faces: not only that
of the past stories that affect our present, but of
the present ones as well. May the overview of these
approaches serve to spark a further curiosity into
the availability of these tools to help those with
current traumatic stories transform those stories
into successful adventures.
Darling G. Villena-Mata is the author of Walking
Between Winds: A Passage Through Societal Trauma -
Discrimination's Impact on Love, Safety, Health, and
Conflict. She may be reached at dvillenamata@nvcc.edu
or 703.339.8871
References
Agatucci, C. (1998). Chinua Achebe in his own words:
On the values and functions of literature and storytelling:
Interviews with Chinua Achebe. Retrieved June 12,
2000 from world wide web: http://www.cocc.ed/cagatucci/classes/hum211/achebe2.htm
Apprey, M., Ph.D. (1998). “Reinventing the
Self in the Face of Received Transgenerational Hatred
in the African American Community.” Paper: Center
for the Study of Mind and Human Interaction, [e-journal
version of hardcopy]
University of Virginia Retrieved on August 18, 2000
from the world wide web: http://hsc.virginia.edu/medicine/inter-dis/csmhi/self.html
Bentzen, M, Jarinaes, E., Levine, P, (1993). The
body self in psychotherapy. A psycho-motoric approach
to developmental psychology. Article. Reno, NV: Ergos
Institute.
Clark, W. R. (1995). At war within: The double-edged
sword of immunity. New York: Oxford University Press.
Cloud, D.L. (1998). Control and consolation in American
culture and politics: Rhetorics of therapy. Thousand
Oaks, California: Sage Publications.
Cross, Jr., W. E. (1998). Black psychological functioning
and the legacy of slavery. In Y. Danieli, Ed.) International
handbook of multigenerational legacies of trauma (pp.
387-402). New York: Plenum Press.
Cushman, Philip. (1995). Constructing the self, constructing
America: A cultural history of psychotherapy. New
York: Addison-Wesley.
Dalton, H. L. (1995). Racial healing: Confronting
the fear between blacks and whites. New York: Anchor/DoubleDay
Books.
Danieli, Y. (Ed.) (1998). International handbook
of multigenerational legacies of trauma. New York:
Plenum Press.
Deer, P.I. (1999). The body as peace: Somatic practice
for transforming conflict. Unpublished dissertation.
Cincinnati, Ohio: Union Institute.
Duran, E. & Duran, B. (1995). Native American
postcolonial psychology. New York: State University
of New York Press.
Fischman, Y. (1990, January). Group treatment of
exiled survivors of torture. American Journal Orthopsychiatry,
60 (1), 135-140.
Fischman, Y. (1991, April). Interacting with trauma:
Clinicians' responses to treating psychological aftereffects
of political repression. American Journal Orthopsychiatry,
61 (2), 179-185.
Levine, P. A. (1996). Waking the tiger: Healing trauma
through the body
Berkeley, CA: North Atlantic Books.
Schutzenberger, A. A. (1998). The ancestor syndrome:
Transgenerational psychotherapy and the hidden links
in the family tree. (A. Trager, Trans.). London and
New York: Routledge.
Villena-Mata, D.G. (2000, Spring). Traumatic conflicts:
An interdisciplinary approach to conflict resolution.
Nonviolent Change, XIV (3), 18-20.
Villena-Mata, D.G. (2001, January). Revenge and Conflict
Resolution. Nonviolent Change XV (2), Winter, 17-19.
Villena-Mata, D.G. (2001) Walking Between Winds:
A Passage Through Societal Trauma - Discrimination's
Impact on Love, Safety, Health, and Conflict
White, M. and Epston, D. (1990). Narrative means
to therapeutic ends. New York: W.W. Norton and Company.
Yehuda, R., Schmeidler, J., Elkin, A., Wilson, S.,
Siever, L, Binder-Brynes, K., Wainberg, M. & Aferiot,
D. (1998). In Y. Danieli (Ed.) International handbook
of multigenerational legacies of trauma (pp.639-656).
New York and London: Plenum Press.
|